Stooo wrote:Russell Brand? I remember when he was drugged up to the eyeballs and actually funny, he's a vacant-eyed waste of space like the rest of them now.
It's bizarre how he's ended up as a conspiracy theorist poster boy for the alt-right.
Stooo wrote:Russell Brand? I remember when he was drugged up to the eyeballs and actually funny, he's a vacant-eyed waste of space like the rest of them now.
Holly wrote:Why exactly is he crazy?
Because he doesn't comply with your ideology?
If you'd listen to RB more often, you'd realise that he isn't RW at all, just the opposite, but he doesn't go along with some of the LW BS either.
He says it often enough that he isn't a Trump fan at all.
.SF. wrote:Stooo wrote:Russell Brand? I remember when he was drugged up to the eyeballs and actually funny, he's a vacant-eyed waste of space like the rest of them now.
It's bizarre how he's ended up as a conspiracy theorist poster boy for the alt-right.
Stooo wrote:.SF. wrote:Stooo wrote:Russell Brand? I remember when he was drugged up to the eyeballs and actually funny, he's a vacant-eyed waste of space like the rest of them now.
It's bizarre how he's ended up as a conspiracy theorist poster boy for the alt-right.
Lawrence Fox drank the same Kool-Aid as well as a few others. Roger Waters being an actual nazi was a bit of a shock
Again the more centerist side has the MSP's, George Harrison and Gary bloody Lineker
Cactus Jack wrote:Back to the subject of Trump.
When Sam Bankman-Fried published a letter his girlfriend sent to him during their relationship his bail was revoked and he was taken into custody because the judge decided it crossed the line and was an attempt to influence or interfere with a witness against him - the former girlfriend is a witness.
Trump has posted many times on his social media platform, and made open reference in the press to prosecutors, witnesses and others involved with his case that has resulted in open attempts to intimidate those witnesses including death threats but he remains a free man.
Why are those who protested the lenient double standard applied to Hunter Biden compared to people who were guilty of similar offences not making the same protests about Trump not being in custody like SBF
HobbitFeet wrote:Isn't that the way it should be?
Nobody should be above the law
I feel that too many people have used their positions to evade the law, and I would be ok if each and every one of them found themselves in a court of law
they have opportunity to defend themselves there, and a verdict based in law not popularity will be reached
Holly wrote:There you go guys, I saved you the "joyful" trouble
No doubt there will be T-shirts, coffee mugs, and other paraphernalia floating around very soon.
Imagine if they can do things like that to a former president, what they can actually do to their unimportant little citizens if they don't behave.
This is not a win for Democracy, just the opposite.
I'm pretty sure that if he had withdrawn from the race, this wouldn't happen, but look what's happening...he's leading in the polls.
To lock up your political opponent is something Putin or Xi Jinping would do.
Stooo wrote:.SF. wrote:Stooo wrote:Russell Brand? I remember when he was drugged up to the eyeballs and actually funny, he's a vacant-eyed waste of space like the rest of them now.
It's bizarre how he's ended up as a conspiracy theorist poster boy for the alt-right.
Lawrence Fox drank the same Kool-Aid as well as a few others. Roger Waters being an actual nazi was a bit of a shock
Again the more centerist side has the MSP's, George Harrison and Gary bloody Lineker
Holly wrote:
There's so much proof for corruption against the whole Biden family,
Cactus Jack wrote:Holly wrote:
There's so much proof for corruption against the whole Biden family,
Except there isn't.
The DOJ have investigated, they did so without the constant drumbeat from a propaganda mediasphere making unsubstansiated claims every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year. The did so without anyone filing motions in court that were ruled to be a deliberate waste of time. They did so without anyone starting up a social media network of their own because they were banned from others for lying. But they did it, and they didn't find any proof.
They found Hunter Biden had committed some crimes and arguably gave him a pretty sweet deal but done of the Biden family interfered with the investigation - Joe Biden even left the Trump appointed prosecutor and investigators in place (which is very unusual for an incoming President) just to distance himself from any possible influence.
Are you saying the Trump appointed prosecutors are corrupt?
And even supposing that were true - just because Hunter Biden committed a crime it doesn't mean Trump is innocent.
Read the indictments.
There are witnesses, there is documentation, there is more than enough to bring a case.
Indictments aren't convictions. Donald Trump can have his day in court. Donald Trump can appear on the witness stand and give his version of what happened UNDER OATH. Not to a friend on a right wing network that will coax him in what to say and never fact check or challenge. Not to a gullible group of followers who follow him around the country to hang on his every syllable. Not in a venue where the answer to difficult questions is "Hunter Biden".
And he doesn't even have to be telling the truth, all he needs to do is satisfy two out of twelve people that there is sufficient doubt for a person to reasonably believe he did not commit those crimes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests