Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 05, 2022 1:17 am

Stooo wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:I don't know how anyone of any persuasion can support Biden.
What the hell is the game plan putting him there and who's plan was it?


You need to consider the other option and what a fascist US tied to Putin would mean for the world (you and I, not billionaires). He's the best worse option. There are far better rising behind him but there is ripply water ahead. I fear for the actual democracy of the US.




The Democrats are scrambling to find someone to run instead of Biden in 24. Someone that Democrat voters will actually vote for never someone who independents will support. As to the rest of your post. Just because you refuse to believe it and put it down to fox news. The Biden's involvement with taking back hander's from China and Russia. Is out there that even left wing media now say is true.
The Jan 6th hearings is going nowhere and the dems are trying their best in the hope that it gain them votes because they can't run on Biden's success as a President. The dems have had 50 years to do something about Roe V Wade but did nothing. Biden was an elected official for 47 of those years and even was against abortion...before he was for it.
This July 4th weekend 64 people were shot 15 fatally in Chicago in black on black crime. Not a word from Biden or the dems. A what is believed to be a white shooter. Kills 9 people at a parade and the dems are fighting each other to get air time to decry it.
The dems have brought the USA to it's knees and and the American voter know just who is to blame and it's not Putin like Biden thought/ hoped we'd believe his lies/BS :dunno:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Cactus Jack » Fri Jul 08, 2022 7:21 pm

It didn't take long for what would "never happen" to happen.

A 10 year old rape victim who was found to be just over six weeks pregnant was ordered to go through to term with what would have been a life threatening pregnancy by the Ohio courts.

https://eu.cincinnati.com/story/news/20 ... 788415001/

A doctor sent the ten year old to a clinic in neighbouring Indiana, itself contemplating very restrictive abortion laws that have - fortunately for the ten year old rape victim - yet to be passed.

Had the child been carried to term Ohio's laws would also have granted the paedophile rapist parental rights over the child he could have used to further abuse his young victim.

The GOP is standing up for the rights of paedophiles and rapists at the expense of women.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21798
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Toke 'n' gesture » Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:40 pm

A bit of common sense, this time anyway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-67655149
User avatar
Toke 'n' gesture
 
Posts: 4314
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:25 pm
Location: Here, there and everywhere

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Cactus Jack » Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:49 pm

Toke 'n' gesture wrote:A bit of common sense, this time anyway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-67655149

Not really.

Sanity, and freedom, is not having a situation where the judge has to make the decision.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21798
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Toke 'n' gesture » Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:57 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Toke 'n' gesture wrote:A bit of common sense, this time anyway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-67655149

Not really.

Sanity, and freedom, is not having a situation where the judge has to make the decision.



Maybe so, but the decision could've gone the other way, so common sense did prevail this time.
User avatar
Toke 'n' gesture
 
Posts: 4314
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:25 pm
Location: Here, there and everywhere

Re: Roe v Wade SCOTUS Leak

Postby Cactus Jack » Mon Dec 11, 2023 10:54 am

Toke 'n' gesture wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Toke 'n' gesture wrote:A bit of common sense, this time anyway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-67655149

Not really.

Sanity, and freedom, is not having a situation where the judge has to make the decision.



Maybe so, but the decision could've gone the other way, so common sense did prevail this time.

Whilst I agree this outcome was OK it's better to have good systems that occassionally give bad outcomes than to have bad systems that once in a while give good outcomes.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21798
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Previous

Return to US News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests