Speaking of that video, Trump was 46 in that video.
When I was that age, I went out with girls in their early 20's.
As long as they were consenting, did I do something wrong?
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A 2009 settlement agreement between the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Giuffre, which bears directly on Giuffre's civil lawsuit accusing Britain's Prince Andrew of sexual abuse, will be made public early next week.
In a joint order on Wednesday, U.S. District Judges Lewis Kaplan and Loretta Preska in Manhattan ordered the agreement's release on or about Jan. 3, 2022, finding no reason to keep it under seal.
Maddog wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:Maddog wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:This isn't on a plane - Einstein and Trump leering over which pussies to grab.
Nah, that's at Trumps place.
I think you've made the point quite well that Trump had no need for Epstein. He could buy all the pussy he wanted.
I know it was, it states that on the video description.
They're both dirty old perves.
Probably. But this is about Epstein and what happened with the girls he groomed. Trump had zero need for any help from Epstein. There were never any shortage of women willing to exchange sex for a lavish lifestyle. Story as old as dirt.
Rock stars, movie stars and billionaires each had their groupies. As long as they were consenting adults, I don't give a shit. Epstein seemed to skip the part about them being adults. That was his mistake.
Stooo wrote:Maddog wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:Maddog wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:This isn't on a plane - Einstein and Trump leering over which pussies to grab.
Nah, that's at Trumps place.
I think you've made the point quite well that Trump had no need for Epstein. He could buy all the pussy he wanted.
I know it was, it states that on the video description.
They're both dirty old perves.
Probably. But this is about Epstein and what happened with the girls he groomed. Trump had zero need for any help from Epstein. There were never any shortage of women willing to exchange sex for a lavish lifestyle. Story as old as dirt.
Rock stars, movie stars and billionaires each had their groupies. As long as they were consenting adults, I don't give a shit. Epstein seemed to skip the part about them being adults. That was his mistake.
Paedophilia is not a mistake, it's a choice to abuse children. Trump is named on papers alleging the rape of a 13 year old child.
Maddog wrote:
Yes he is, but that has nothing to do with Epstein.
Maybe he did rape that girl. Prosecutors won't touch the case and even slimey lawyers are steering clear.
Where is that case right now?
Stooo wrote:Maddog wrote:
Yes he is, but that has nothing to do with Epstein.
Maybe he did rape that girl. Prosecutors won't touch the case and even slimey lawyers are steering clear.
Where is that case right now?
It was used in the prosecution of Maxwell and by association Epstein. This is not difficult.
Maddog wrote:Stooo wrote:Maddog wrote:
Yes he is, but that has nothing to do with Epstein.
Maybe he did rape that girl. Prosecutors won't touch the case and even slimey lawyers are steering clear.
Where is that case right now?
It was used in the prosecution of Maxwell and by association Epstein. This is not difficult.
Really? A potential civil suit against Trump was brought up in the criminal case against Maxwell?
Shouldn't be difficult to cite it.
Guest wrote:Maddog wrote:Stooo wrote:Maddog wrote:
Yes he is, but that has nothing to do with Epstein.
Maybe he did rape that girl. Prosecutors won't touch the case and even slimey lawyers are steering clear.
Where is that case right now?
It was used in the prosecution of Maxwell and by association Epstein. This is not difficult.
Really? A potential civil suit against Trump was brought up in the criminal case against Maxwell?
Shouldn't be difficult to cite it.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/je ... s-rcna7253
Jane didn’t allege any improper behavior by Trump and didn’t go into further detail about why she was at the resort.
It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.
Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.
Maddog wrote:Guest wrote:Maddog wrote:Stooo wrote:Maddog wrote:
Yes he is, but that has nothing to do with Epstein.
Maybe he did rape that girl. Prosecutors won't touch the case and even slimey lawyers are steering clear.
Where is that case right now?
It was used in the prosecution of Maxwell and by association Epstein. This is not difficult.
Really? A potential civil suit against Trump was brought up in the criminal case against Maxwell?
Shouldn't be difficult to cite it.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/je ... s-rcna7253Jane didn’t allege any improper behavior by Trump and didn’t go into further detail about why she was at the resort.
Wrong girl. The 14 year old accusing Epstein and Maxwell never accused Trump of anything.
The girl in the case of the 13 year old accusing Trump has never been identified, nor ever testified anywhere. Even many liberal journalists who have reported on the case doubt this person even exists.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests