The New Gammon Army

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:00 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:He's against all this shite about "white privilege", so that's good.



How would you word it?


Word what?


The white privilege debate?



I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:01 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:11 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?


I'd say it was offensive to white people who do not feel in any way privileged.
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:13 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?


I'd say it was offensive to white people who do not feel in any way privileged.


You're against showing them a mirror that proves that they are?
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:14 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?


I'd say it was offensive to white people who do not feel in any way privileged.


You're against showing them a mirror that proves that they are?


What is the proof?
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:16 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:What is the proof?


You're not interested in that or even having a look at the evidence. You just appear to want to be a victim, don't worry there's loads of you.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:19 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:What is the proof?


You're not interested in that or even having a look at the evidence. You just appear to want to be a victim, don't worry there's loads of you.


Why are you claiming I'm a victim? It's people who bang on about "white privilege" who think black people are victims, and that white people should carry guilt just for being white.
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Dean » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:20 pm

Does being this ‘woke’ make you a hit with the ladies, Stooo?
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 47578
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:20 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:What is the proof?


You're not interested in that or even having a look at the evidence. You just appear to want to be a victim, don't worry there's loads of you.


Why are you claiming I'm a victim? It's people who bang on about "white privilege" who think black people are victims, and that white people should carry guilt just for being white.


I don't think that at all because I've chosen to inform myself.

Give it a go once in a while.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:21 pm

Dean wrote:Does being this ‘woke’ make you a hit with the ladies, Stooo?


Fighting them off with a shitty stick...
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:22 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:What is the proof?


You're not interested in that or even having a look at the evidence. You just appear to want to be a victim, don't worry there's loads of you.


Why are you claiming I'm a victim? It's people who bang on about "white privilege" who think black people are victims, and that white people should carry guilt just for being white.


I don't think that at all because I've chosen to inform myself.

Give it a go once in a while.


What exactly have you informed yourself of?

Generalising about white people is as bad as generalising about black people.
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Stooo » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:27 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:What is the proof?


You're not interested in that or even having a look at the evidence. You just appear to want to be a victim, don't worry there's loads of you.


Why are you claiming I'm a victim? It's people who bang on about "white privilege" who think black people are victims, and that white people should carry guilt just for being white.


I don't think that at all because I've chosen to inform myself.

Give it a go once in a while.


What exactly have you informed yourself of?

Generalising about white people is as bad as generalising about black people.


Indeed which is why I chose to look into the issue, there's no point in talking to you about it if you are ignorant of the subject :dunno:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118857
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Red Okktober » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:28 pm

Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?


I'd say it was offensive to white people who do not feel in any way privileged.


You're against showing them a mirror that proves that they are?


'They'? I thought you were a whitey yourself?

I consider myself a normal white bloke.

By your own definition, you must consider yourself a 'white privileged gammon'. Does it feel good?
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6437
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:29 pm

Stooo wrote:
Indeed which is why I chose to look into the issue, there's no point in talking to you about it if you are ignorant of the subject :dunno:


That's fine - I'd rather not hear all that shite you're bound to come out with. :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

Re: The New Gammon Army

Postby Raggamuffin » Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:30 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I wouldn't - I'd scrap it.


Let's say that you couldn't because of free speech. How would you word your side of the debate?


I'd say it was offensive to white people who do not feel in any way privileged.


You're against showing them a mirror that proves that they are?


'They'? I thought you were a whitey yourself?

I consider myself a normal white bloke.

By your own definition, you must consider yourself a 'white privileged gammon'. Does it feel good?


You can't be a white gammon, you can only be a pink one. :gigglesnshit:
User avatar
Raggamuffin
 
Posts: 41373
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to UK News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests