Russell Brand

[Red Okktober]

If the authorities aren't prepared to pursue blatant lawbreaking and fraud (the recent 'writing off' of the £3.6B Covid fraud comes to mind) then where does the public interest lie and who is supposed to inform the public about what's actually behind it without delving and uncovering inconvenient facts and evidence?

Which end of the face-stamping jackboot do you want to be on?

Where is Brand's 'blatant lawbreaking'? There is a claim that he historically raped someone, which I've already said should go through the courts, otherwise it's just nonsense about 'emotional abuse' and him being 'a bit rough' and other assorted unprovable claims.

Imagine if you were a journalist (you can't string two coherent sentences together, so that would never happen) and you had carte blanche to 'out' celebrities for various alleged crimes? Given your obsession with the likes of Trump, Boris, Farage, and most people right of centre - the shit you post about them on here to a miniscule audience, would be shit reported in a newspaper to a much wider audience, and some might actually believe you, ie some mud will stick.

So no, letting a journalist write what he or she wants to, without being cross-examined or providing suitable evidence, isn't the way to serve up justice.

[3rdleg.]

Who the fuck is Russel Brand?

[ArchieG]

If the authorities aren't prepared to pursue blatant lawbreaking and fraud (the recent 'writing off' of the £3.6B Covid fraud comes to mind) then where does the public interest lie and who is supposed to inform the public about what's actually behind it without delving and uncovering inconvenient facts and evidence?

Which end of the face-stamping jackboot do you want to be on?

Where is Brand's 'blatant lawbreaking'? There is a claim that he historically raped someone, which I've already said should go through the courts, otherwise it's just nonsense about 'emotional abuse' and him being 'a bit rough' and other assorted unprovable claims.

Imagine if you were a journalist (you can't string two coherent sentences together, so that would never happen) and you had carte blanche to 'out' celebrities for various alleged crimes? Given your obsession with the likes of Trump, Boris, Farage, and most people right of centre - the shit you post about them on here to a miniscule audience, would be shit reported in a newspaper to a much wider audience, and some might actually believe you, ie some mud will stick.

So no, letting a journalist write what he or she wants to, without being cross-examined or providing suitable evidence, isn't the way to serve up justice.

How about him admitting on a recorded radio show that he’d just got his cock out, the woman in question having only recently realised the admission was actually broadcast. Is that evidence? Usually it’s a bit ‘he said, she said’. Here, they both agree, and it’s recorded.

[Stooo]

One line in the Dispatches doc that really stuck out was from Lorraine Heggessey: "There's a pattern that seems to follow Russell Brand throughout his career. He misbehaves, he transgresses what would normally be acceptable within broadcasting and he gets rewarded – by a promotion, by another show, by something else."

That sentiment certainly rang true with someone who was working out in LA around the time of the Sachsgate incident.

When that particular scandal made the front page of Variety, everyone in Hollywood assumed Russell had deliberately cooked up the entire controversy as a way of raising his profile – because it just so happened to be the very same week that his people were negotiating another movie project for him after the success of Forgetting Sarah Marshall.

Negotiations which ended with him getting his own spin-off – the project that became Get Him To The Greek.

Popbitch.

[LordRaven]

It’s amazing that the things that made this talentless twat popular are now coming back to bite him on the ass.

The Saville squad are investigating now too.

“Jimmy Savile detective squad joins Russell Brand rape probe

A crack detective unit set up in the wake of the Sir Jimmy Savile scandal has joined the police probe into rape and sexual assault allegations being made against entertainer Russell Brand.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/18152 ... savile/amp

He must be crapping his panties.

[3rdleg.]

Who the fuck is Russel Brand?

Righto, googled, a nobody that has took his so called fame and used it to abuse women and by the looks of it under aged also.. Well this fucker can go down and we can throw away the key.

[Cactus Jack]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

[Cactus Jack]

Rape and false allegations of rape need to be treated as two separate things. Both are terrible, both devastate lives, They are not interchangeable. There are penalties to pay for people who are proven to have made false allegations of rape, just as there are penalties to pay for people who are proven to have committed rape.

You don't get people saying you can't report a murder because some people have been falsely accused of murder in the past.

Hobbit's link is worth reading.

It isn't quite the same.

An allegation that a person who no-one can prove ever existed was murdered six years ago with no body found, no missing person's report ever filed and no forensic evidence of any kind wouldn't make any headlines.

[Stooo]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

The alleged pervert that isn't being investigated by GB news?

[Guest]

Rape and false allegations of rape need to be treated as two separate things. Both are terrible, both devastate lives, They are not interchangeable. There are penalties to pay for people who are proven to have made false allegations of rape, just as there are penalties to pay for people who are proven to have committed rape.

You don't get people saying you can't report a murder because some people have been falsely accused of murder in the past.

Hobbit's link is worth reading.

It isn't quite the same.

An allegation that a person who no-one can prove ever existed was murdered six years ago with no body found, no missing person's report ever filed and no forensic evidence of any kind wouldn't make any headlines.

I was thinking more of Christopher Jefferies.

[Guest]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

Were the allegations against Dan Wootton known 4 years ago when the Times and Dispatches investigation into Brand began?

[Cactus Jack]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

Were the allegations against Dan Wootton known 4 years ago when the Times and Dispatches investigation into Brand began?

I don't know I'm not a CT type

[Cactus Jack]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

The alleged pervert that isn't being investigated by GB news?

The very same

[Cactus Jack]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

The alleged pervert that isn't being investigated by GB news?

The very same

[LordRaven]

If you were a CT type person would you believe that Russell Brand is being sacrificed to save Dan Wootton?

The alleged pervert that isn't being investigated by GB news?

The very same

GB news, and Talk TV?