Stooo wrote:Guest wrote:Re: puberty blockers, it's a touchy subject for sure and there are people with very strong views on both sides of the debate. The issue is there isn't really any substantial data either way to draw any firm conclusions about the safety of puberty blockers. It's a double edged sword, we can't confidently say that puberty blockers are safe to prescribe without the data, but we won't have any data if they are not prescribed. We also need to be careful that the data is gathered in a thorough and unbiased manner so that the results are not skewed. That's the only way we can have a truly nuanced discussion on the subject.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56601386
They're mainly used on kids who have ASD and are already having issues with the changes that puberty brings, it's more baseless moral outrage.
In your opinion, in reality though, this does seem unnatural.
Let kids develop beyond puberty, naturally, and let them make a choice.
Without people like you voting to make a decision for them.
One wrong choice, manifesting itself year later would be a tragedy.
As Rolly often said in the past “wake up people!”