Guest wrote:British cycling has banned trans cyclists from ladies cycling events.
That's not an entirely accurate statement.
British cycling has banmned trans cyclists from elite level cycling events, a small but significant difference.
When cycling in a fun event, or in an event where there is an 'elite' competition and an 'everyone else' competition a trans woman is perfectly entitled to compete in the 'everyone else' category. She simply cannot compete as an elite athlete.
I get that. As a fan of Grand Prix I know that a small technical rule that bans a things that could add 0.001 seconds to a car's performance is banned because the way F1 operates means that small change can make the difference between middle of the pact running and utterly dominating a season.
There are rules in cycling that mean if a pedal is 0.1 mm longer than it should be a bike is ineligible, and if you were to take that same bike to a fun tri-athlon around a local park no-one would bat and eye-lid.
British cycling aren't saying trans-women aren't women, they're anyone who has gone through male puberty has an unfair advantage - and that's what the science tells us.
So trans-women who want to cycle as women in their local clubs can do so, they just can't be women at the elite level.
There are two categories - women born as women who have live their whole lives as women, and anyone else.