Guest wrote:Cherry de Voured wrote:Yeah, the funny thing is most of the feminists I know wouldn't like that photo either - mainly because it states that "women are crazy". It should really be "some women are crazy". As for the hand-fucking reference - well let's face it, if you didn't feel so desperate to stick your dick in it, it wouldn't be much of a threat, would it?
Face it - this because she's a fairly attractive woman. If she was some pig-faced, acne-ridden woman with more tyres than the Michelin Man, you'd laugh it off. Much like I do when I see the losers on the anti-women "men's rights" activist websites who still live at home with their Mum, having all their meals and laundry done for 'em.
Not sure I understand the BIB. Desperate tos tick your dick in it/ wouldn't be much of a threat. What's that all about? I'm still not getting it (the comment that is!).
As for the last paragraph, I'd say it'd be the other way round re if it had been a pig faced tyre laden woman.
It's interesting that the reaction to this is- oh it's just a silly picture, brush it off. If it were a man saying to a woman that unless they want to go back to flicking the bean, they have to deal with men, I'd wager the reaction would be rather more outraged.
Well, the threat relies on the notion that she has something to offer (her cunt, specifically). If it had've been a far less attractive woman, the threat would've been null - because it'd be like saying to a Vegetarian, 'If you ever want to eat a Big Mac again, you'll try our new Chicken Nuggets'. Well if you don't eat meat, where's the threat? Nowhere - the threat's laughable.
The reason I think it is a silly, stupid photograph - among many on Facebook - is because for starters, she's not really empowering herself. Not only is she degrading what is probably just her non-maleness as 'crazy', but she's also talking about her cunt as if it's the only thing she has to offer the male sex.
Would it cause as much outrage if it were a man to a woman? No. And I'll tell you why: female masturbation isn't seen as the 'poor replica' of sex that male masturbation is. With males, a bit of hand-shandying is seen as the means to an end - no sex, so it's back to Lady Palmer and her five friends tonight. It's not seen as quite so desperate and sinister when it's a woman.
Why? Well it probably has a lot to do with the long-held misconception that somehow women don't enjoy sex, or at least not in the same way men do. There's various other complications and differences, but essentially, that's it.
I don't quite understand your last paragraph either, sorry!
that was unintentional but seems apt
