IamtheWalrus wrote:IamtheWalrus wrote:Unproven suggestion that an lbc presenter was sacked because "Israeli leaders" bullied LBC into it - fine
Unproven suggestion that George Soros is funding campus protests and suddenly Weavie can point out that's anti semitic.
Why then does he look the other way at all the other egregious examples including the LBC one, especially as both involve the trope of the control exerted by Israel/Jews
It's those #doublestandards I was talking about earlier.
And now it's since been confirmed by left-leaning sources that George Soros IS funding groups behind the Pro-Palestine demonstrations, which makes Weavie look even more stupid. Especially considering how much he donates to left-wing causes in general.
In recent days on AVF we've had references to:
a) "Israeli lobby" getting an LBC presenter sacked
b) Soros funding campus protests
C) AIPAC lobbying pro-Israel Republicans and Democrats
Why then can Weavie only call out as antisemitic the mention of George Soros?
Besides, it's not antisemitic to point out that Soros funds certain causes, or that AIPAC lobby politicians. The antisemitism occurs when you use their Jewishness as the vector of attack. Arguably, the suggestion that the "Israeli lobby" got an LBC presenter sacked is the most antisemitic of the lot.....
Dude. GET. HELP.