Holly wrote:Food for thoughts? Might explain the cost of living going up, and up, and up.....
.SF. wrote:Holly wrote:Food for thoughts? Might explain the cost of living going up, and up, and up.....
New World Order. I liked him when he did his Coast TV show but he seems to have come out as yet another conspiracy theorist. Shame really, he should have stuck with archaeology.
.SF. wrote:Holly wrote:Food for thoughts? Might explain the cost of living going up, and up, and up.....
New World Order. I liked him when he did his Coast TV show but he seems to have come out as yet another conspiracy theorist. Shame really, he should have stuck with archaeology.
.SF. wrote:You have to be able to distinguish between someone loosely using the term 'a new world order' meaning things have changed or may change, for instance what Kerry Chant meant about the covid world where changes were being introduced, and the New World Order conspiracy that refers to the idea that there's a secret group conspiring to rule the world.
If I remember right the same video was put up and the same thing was explained here a year or so ago, you might have forgotten.
HobbitFeet wrote:yes, this has been covered and explained before
viewtopic.php?f=29&t=80777&start=30#p1911579
.SF. wrote:HobbitFeet wrote:yes, this has been covered and explained before
http://www.thesleepingdogs.net/viewtopi ... 0#p1911579
It falls on deaf ears so you have to ask yourself what's the point in explaining.
Holly wrote:ETA; Who's to say your explanation's are the right ones, and I'm wrong with everything I say?
.SF. wrote:Holly wrote:ETA; Who's to say your explanation's are the right ones, and I'm wrong with everything I say?
I've simply pointed out the differences in the way this particular expression can be used.
Holly wrote:Anyway, have you seen that video I've posted in the Random thread? it really is very interesting to watch.
.SF. wrote:Holly wrote:Anyway, have you seen that video I've posted in the Random thread? it really is very interesting to watch.
I looked at some but not all of it. Despite it's title it doesn't seem to cover conspiracy theories, it's more a list of dodgy things governments got up to in the past, like in the 1950s using human tissue to test effects of nuclear radiation, and cloud seeding in Vietnam as a means of war.
I think what you're trying to get at is that conspiracy theories shouldn't be ignored as sometimes they turn out to be true, but I don't think the video supports that argument.
Holly wrote:.SF. wrote:Holly wrote:Anyway, have you seen that video I've posted in the Random thread? it really is very interesting to watch.
I looked at some but not all of it. Despite it's title it doesn't seem to cover conspiracy theories, it's more a list of dodgy things governments got up to in the past, like in the 1950s using human tissue to test effects of nuclear radiation, and cloud seeding in Vietnam as a means of war.
I think what you're trying to get at is that conspiracy theories shouldn't be ignored as sometimes they turn out to be true, but I don't think the video supports that argument.
That's right, the government was up to no good in the past, so do you think the government has changed, and they're all good guys running it now? Ha
Anyway, how can you say that video doesn't support that argument when you didn't even watch it all? There's a lot more on it than what you pointed out. Did you see how they dragged people into a brothel and drugged them? Or injected them with Syphilis? You also trivialised the cloud seeding. But anyway, from what you saw, did you find it at least interesting, even if you don't think it has anything to do with conspiracy theories?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests