Guest wrote:art0hur0moh wrote:Guest wrote:
Yes, which means it doesn't share a 100% genetic sequence to SARS-CoV which means it is a close cousin to the original SARS but it is not the same, hence why it is given the name SARS-CoV 2.
there was mention of 96% genomic sequence indicated in the next paragraph, can't remember details!
sars is the symptom, pulmonary edema. cov-1 is alphacoronavirus, betacoronavirus is covid 19, hence cov-2. To be pedantic HCoV-...
covid 19 pandemic ended in may!
SARS is the name given to a virus Art and it's a betacoronavirus as is SARS-CoV 2 and no, the pandemic did not end in May.
Yes it did end in may! fig 2, or you could find the chines 2013, and american 2017 studies. For peer review!
sars is pulmonary edema, the symptom! Which was first identified in patients in 2003 before the assumed cause was claimed to be coronavirus. HCoV (omitting H, is also indicating the presumption it is not human and could in fact be a genetically engineered virus from the democrat backed cdc lab in wuhan! What do you think?) is Human coronavirus and two is the genus betacronavirus oc43. Now if you can provide clearer information how that is incorrect other than corporate advertisers impersonation the free press, i look forward to seeing your presentation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 1Chb0dpW4Uthis is interesting!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591312/ Also shows the problems (without including pcr being to sensitive for reliable data...) with plenty of unconfirmed assumptions about viral pathology. It seems a culture can't be made with fine particles, they just float around the petri dish?
"However, surgical masks are not as efficient at preventing release of very small particles. It is well known that surgical masks are not effective for preventing exposure to fine particles when worn as personal protection." It indicates the fine particles are the significant viral load. This so far is only the second study i have come across, but mention of two others! Followed the data related to boots masks, falsely claiming protection from viruses! They are only effective to the maximum extent the study indicates if not moist and replaced often!
Yet as .gov data indicates since 2011 (lowest year for mortality) there is a rise in mortality in winter months. Though i was unable to confirm that is related to infections and not other factors related to weather or mental health.
