Grafenwalder wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Grafenwalder wrote:Yaxley committed the libel, not them, hence the reason he was in court.
That was a civil case though. Do you not think they should be prosecuted? After all, they went after the poor boy.
If you don't think so, why is that? Perhaps you think that people aren't responsible for their actions.
The 16 year old boy who set on him outside the school was interviewed by West Yorkshire Police and reported for summons for an offence of assault.
Some people don't think they have to take responsibility for their actions and believe they are above the law - Yaxley is one of them.
Wasn't there abuse towards the Syrian boy after Tommy got it wrong though? That's what I was talking about. Do you not hold them responsible for their own behaviour?
I think that was the online abuse which resulted in the Hijazi family moving from the area. Everyone is responsible for their own behaviour, sadly some don't take it and are incapable of making any adult decisions. They look for a "leader" they can fawn over who will tell them what to do, what to think, and what they should believe.
It's a pity they didn't see the video where he said he got it wrong.
I don't think that being incapable of making adult decisions excuses them. I'm surprised that nothing has been done to track them down and prosecute them.