17 Dead in school shooting.

[Maddog]

Any ideas why people with mental health issues don't go on rampages in other developed countries? USA has one every 9 days, almost.

No other country encourages shooting as much as the US, or has such easy access to firearms. Ffs, they take children to gun ranges, have a gun lobby and believe they are the cowboys of the world. Team America hit the nail on the head, “fuck yeah”!

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

[Lady Murasaki]

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

[calitom]

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

"but not in the number of incidents per week"--do u realize that the swiss have 8 million people-usa has 340 million???? come on ....
that killing was very suspect in FL...nothing to do with the 2nd amendment and everything to do with politics. There were witnesses who saw things that make the official story a huge joke.

[Guest]

Any ideas why people with mental health issues don't go on rampages in other developed countries? USA has one every 9 days, almost.

I know. Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird clearly didn’t exist.

Well said.
What years where they in?
2018?
2017?
2016?
2015?
2014?
2013?
2012?

Earlier?
No way.

[Maddog]

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?

[Guest]

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?

Why is it then that the UK, where the last mass shooting was in 2010, hasn't had 3 or 4 mass shootings this year?

[calitom]

"Lady Murasaki"]

The Swiss do. And they actually.have a mass shooting now and then too.

Your master decided that no one is to have anything resembling real firepower. Probably for the best.

Who’s my master? Our govt?

The Swiss don’t have that troublesome 2nd amendment in their constitution that enables you lot kill your children en masse.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?[/quote]

Why is it then that the UK, where the last mass shooting was in 2010, hasn't had 3 or 4 mass shootings this year?[/quote]

because you dont have the fbi setting them up for you?

[Is it me?]

because you dont have the fbi setting them up for you?

What are you twattering on about?
We don't have cunts who have access to assault rifles.
We don't have draft dodging leader who stupidly reckoned he would run to the school armed with a revolver and shoot up an NRA gun nut armed with an assault rifle.
Catch my drift?

[Lady Murasaki]

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?

We did this already in another thread. When you compare populations, the frequency of US shootings still comes out on top.

[Maddog]

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?

We did this already in another thread. When you compare populations, the frequency of US shootings still comes out on top.

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

[Lady Murasaki]

Yes.

They have mass shootings, and based on their tiny population, they beat team in USA in the per capita race for first place.

But not in the number of incidents per week. You must be immune to how unusual school shootings are to be so flippant about it.

Correct. A country 40 times more populated might have an event occur about 40 times more often.

Funny how that works eh?

We did this already in another thread. When you compare populations, the frequency of US shootings still comes out on top.

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Those countries do not have mass shootings weekly or even monthly.

(If men behaved better then women wouldn’t want to shoot them.)

[Guest]

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

[Lady Murasaki]

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

He has no argument, ever.

[Maddog]

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

Not if you're a female who just smoked a guy who walked right through a restraining order eh?

[Guest]

Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

Not if you're a female who just smoked a guy who walked right through a restraining order eh?

Not then, but for the many more times that women are subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse, which is five times more likely in gun owning households, or when she is killed, sixteen times more likely in gun owning households, then your argument lies in tatters.

I guess if you're the sort of person who would gladly pay $1,000 for the chance to win $10 and hated all women that would make sense but to everyone else it's kinda stupid