Cannydc wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Guest wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Big Fat Frosty wrote:lessons were learned..
how to fuck over the next generation.
and the next and the next
Given up already?
The answers don't have to be complicated but you lot are so entrenched in your opinions you can't see the simplicity of it all.
Why don't you womansplain the answers to us then, if you believe you know what they are? Clearly our tiny little male brains need help in understanding.
TIA.
I have. But this lot can't do the maths.
That sounds a lot like "I can't find anyone who agrees with me, so I'll throw my toys out of the cot"
My last word on the subject is from a study on this subject, presented at the Royal Economic Society's annual conference at the University of Bristol in April 2017.
The research tracks the movement of house prices from the late 1980s to the mid-2000s, and finds that neither demand-side factors such as household income, mortgage rates and credit availability, or the supply of new houses explain price rises during some of that period.
"In particular, the analysis demonstrates that economic fundamentals fail to explain the behaviour of UK regional property prices in the late 1980s and mid-2000s. Interestingly, during these time periods, prices exhibited explosive dynamics, which is in accordance with speculative bubbles in housing markets.
By examining in detail the timeline of price dynamics, we demonstrate that there was a synchronisation of explosive episodes across regional housing markets, leading to house price exuberance at the national level.
Further, we show that the pattern of propagation is consistent with the notion of the so-called ripple effect. Specifically, house price exuberance emanated from Greater London and spread out northward, affecting neighbouring regions with a time lag."
So, not interest rates. As I said on more than one occasion a housing bubble fueled by buyer exuberance and media frenzy - remember the Daily Princess featuring house price rises as front page lead headlines for 2 months without a break.
http://www.res.org.uk/details/mediabrie ... -BOOM.html
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Loans often almost interest free were being given to people on benefits.
Money was being poured into the economy from the magic money tree.
This happened just before the crash of the thirties too.
My bank manager at the time who's husband was also a bank manager told me she was taking early retirement and so was her husband because they wanted no part of what was happening.
Why what's happening I asked.
Do a little research ad see what happens when banks flood an economy with money.
That's wen I figured out a major global financial crisis was coming.
That's when I used to post a lot about it starting in 2006.
What I and many others didn't see was the to big to fail agenda where even more money was plucked from the magic money tree for the banks .... unbelievable.
Not only were they inflating and then deflating the money supply they were also on a huge looting spree.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Oh here we go..
Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Loans often almost interest free were being given to people on benefits.
Money was being poured into the economy from the magic money tree.
This happened just before the crash of the thirties too.
My bank manager at the time who's husband was also a bank manager told me she was taking early retirement and so was her husband because they wanted no part of what was happening.
Why what's happening I asked.
Do a little research ad see what happens when banks flood an economy with money.
That's wen I figured out a major global financial crisis was coming.
That's when I used to post a lot about it starting in 2006.
What I and many others didn't see was the to big to fail agenda where even more money was plucked from the magic money tree for the banks .... unbelievable.
Not only were they inflating and then deflating the money supply they were also on a huge looting spree.
You weren't alone, it was bloody obvious it was all going to blow up at some point. Well, obvious to prudent people.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Oh here we go..
You ask lots of questions and then start snearing at the answers.
You only want answers that will fit with your constrained main stream mind.
All these things can be researched but that only happens if you really want answers.
My advice is stay in your bubble.
Safer that way.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Loans often almost interest free were being given to people on benefits.
Money was being poured into the economy from the magic money tree.
This happened just before the crash of the thirties too.
My bank manager at the time who's husband was also a bank manager told me she was taking early retirement and so was her husband because they wanted no part of what was happening.
Why what's happening I asked.
Do a little research ad see what happens when banks flood an economy with money.
That's wen I figured out a major global financial crisis was coming.
That's when I used to post a lot about it starting in 2006.
What I and many others didn't see was the to big to fail agenda where even more money was plucked from the magic money tree for the banks .... unbelievable.
Not only were they inflating and then deflating the money supply they were also on a huge looting spree.
You weren't alone, it was bloody obvious it was all going to blow up at some point. Well, obvious to prudent people.
But still missed by you is the fact that these bank managers didn't want any part of what was being done.
They knew their history.
They knew it had been done in the thirties by design.
The whole economic system was being purposely herded in one direction.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Oh here we go..
You ask lots of questions and then start snearing at the answers.
You only want answers that will fit with your constrained main stream mind.
All these things can be researched but that only happens if you really want answers.
My advice is stay in your bubble.
Safer that way.
When the choice is bubble or paranoid rabbit hole I think i will stay where I am.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Oh here we go..
You ask lots of questions and then start snearing at the answers.
You only want answers that will fit with your constrained main stream mind.
All these things can be researched but that only happens if you really want answers.
My advice is stay in your bubble.
Safer that way.
When the choice is bubble or paranoid rabbit hole I think i will stay where I am.
Best that way.
It's what the ptb be want of you.
Viper wrote:Lol. Mad CT'er turns off yet another person.
What a weird way to choose to live.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests