Cannydc wrote:"we all know that Rochdale is just the tip of a very large iceberg, covering the whole of North and North Western England."
Do we ?
Or are we just surmising based on the fact that these 2 horrific cases have come to light in a short period of time ? This could of course be explained by the fact that the police have finally decided to get their arses in gear and deal with something they should have dealt with years ago.
And by the way, there is no real evidence that paedophilia is involved. All the girls appear to have been pubescent....
Cannydc wrote:Precisely that. During the recent trial, not one of the 9 defendants had any evidence against them which indicated any desire to abuse pre-pubescent children.
The term 'paedophile' is produced at the drop of a hat by the sensationalist media, is overused and often used in completely incorrect circumstances to strengthen the hate meant to be felt against these people.
They can be hated enough for their crimes, without that.
Raggamuffin wrote:Cannydc wrote:Precisely that. During the recent trial, not one of the 9 defendants had any evidence against them which indicated any desire to abuse pre-pubescent children.
The term 'paedophile' is produced at the drop of a hat by the sensationalist media, is overused and often used in completely incorrect circumstances to strengthen the hate meant to be felt against these people.
They can be hated enough for their crimes, without that.
I agree with you, and I raised the issue in the other thread - ie, if this is the "usual" kind of paedophilia. I don't think it is as these girls are underage but at the same time they're not little children who don't really understand about sex. I don't think it's the media who has used that word though is it? They tend to call it "grooming".
LucianDeville wrote:Hi
Many thanks for allowing us to interject regarding this subject!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The parasites that have been convicted, a really good excuse for another bunch of parasites to play the race card, FACT
The new case, not sure if anyone has been charge as yet, not their exact race. We mention 'race' as some here and many on other sites are already playing the race card, FACT
Please concentrate on the fact that every town and city in the uk has hteir fair share of vulnerable kids and lessons must be learnt and these vulnerable kids, most from broken homes and in care homes must be better educated, ie to be fully weary of dirty old men offering them treats = FACT
Thanks
Lucian Deville
ps, sorry re typos
Cannydc wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Cannydc wrote:Precisely that. During the recent trial, not one of the 9 defendants had any evidence against them which indicated any desire to abuse pre-pubescent children.
The term 'paedophile' is produced at the drop of a hat by the sensationalist media, is overused and often used in completely incorrect circumstances to strengthen the hate meant to be felt against these people.
They can be hated enough for their crimes, without that.
I agree with you, and I raised the issue in the other thread - ie, if this is the "usual" kind of paedophilia. I don't think it is as these girls are underage but at the same time they're not little children who don't really understand about sex. I don't think it's the media who has used that word though is it? They tend to call it "grooming".
Yes, the actual process of getting a girl to enter the web of deceit is termed grooming. It is the lower end of our dead-tree press which scream 'paedo' every time a girl under 16 is involved. Under-age sex isn't to be condoned, of course, but paedophilia it often ain't.
LucianDeville wrote:LucianDeville wrote:Hi
Many thanks for allowing us to interject regarding this subject!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The parasites that have been convicted, a really good excuse for another bunch of parasites to play the race card, FACT
The new case, not sure if anyone has been charge as yet, not their exact race. We mention 'race' as some here and many on other sites are already playing the race card, FACT
Please concentrate on the fact that every town and city in the uk has hteir fair share of vulnerable kids and lessons must be learnt and these vulnerable kids, most from broken homes and in care homes must be better educated, ie to be fully weary of dirty old men offering them treats = FACT
Thanks
Lucian Deville
ps, sorry re typos
Hi Lucian
A very good and indeed factual point you have made.
If you are a caring adult, it is your responsibility to instil into the children you care for the very fact, you don't get something for nothing and many dirty old men and women out there that are ready willing and able to show false compassion, shower with gifts/treats and so-called care, the taken take advantage of the child and make the child feel guilty.
FACT = most of the child abuse is normally carried out by a person known to the family or within the home.
So if you do really care about children, fuck the race card, open you eyes, and look out and educate your loved ones. These days, you cannot even trust people that claim to represent God = FACT.
Many paeds look out for divorced ladies with young kids, befriend them and then the abuse - you can't be too careful.
Years ago we always said, look out for the women paeds but people just laughed. Thankfully, the police have caught up with women paeds!!!
Thanks
Lucian
Facts copyrighted by LD
dontbesilly wrote:Cannydc wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Cannydc wrote:Precisely that. During the recent trial, not one of the 9 defendants had any evidence against them which indicated any desire to abuse pre-pubescent children.
The term 'paedophile' is produced at the drop of a hat by the sensationalist media, is overused and often used in completely incorrect circumstances to strengthen the hate meant to be felt against these people.
They can be hated enough for their crimes, without that.
I agree with you, and I raised the issue in the other thread - ie, if this is the "usual" kind of paedophilia. I don't think it is as these girls are underage but at the same time they're not little children who don't really understand about sex. I don't think it's the media who has used that word though is it? They tend to call it "grooming".
Yes, the actual process of getting a girl to enter the web of deceit is termed grooming. It is the lower end of our dead-tree press which scream 'paedo' every time a girl under 16 is involved. Under-age sex isn't to be condoned, of course, but paedophilia it often ain't.
Hmmm, so you don't consider a girl of 12/13 a child then....interesting to see the asian influence in your life. What age do you consider childhood ends at then canny? If a girl starts her periods at 9/10 years old do you consider her an adult for sexual purposes?
dontbesilly wrote:Cannydc wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Cannydc wrote:Precisely that. During the recent trial, not one of the 9 defendants had any evidence against them which indicated any desire to abuse pre-pubescent children.
The term 'paedophile' is produced at the drop of a hat by the sensationalist media, is overused and often used in completely incorrect circumstances to strengthen the hate meant to be felt against these people.
They can be hated enough for their crimes, without that.
I agree with you, and I raised the issue in the other thread - ie, if this is the "usual" kind of paedophilia. I don't think it is as these girls are underage but at the same time they're not little children who don't really understand about sex. I don't think it's the media who has used that word though is it? They tend to call it "grooming".
Yes, the actual process of getting a girl to enter the web of deceit is termed grooming. It is the lower end of our dead-tree press which scream 'paedo' every time a girl under 16 is involved. Under-age sex isn't to be condoned, of course, but paedophilia it often ain't.
Hmmm, so you don't consider a girl of 12/13 a child then....interesting to see the asian influence in your life. What age do you consider childhood ends at then canny? If a girl starts her periods at 9/10 years old do you consider her an adult for sexual purposes?
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests