by Cactus Jack » Sat May 04, 2024 2:25 pm
Away from Trump's inability to control his bowel movements and stay awake the rest of the trial hasn't been going in a direction anyone in the MAGA camp would like.
I think the strategy for Donald Trump, and he used it before the trial ever started, was to attack Michael Cohen, cast doubt on his credibility and pursue a strategy of jury negation based on the Trump v Cohen narrative, and that's not how it has been working out at all.
First Trump's long time friend, and someone who clearly bears no animus towards the former President, David Pecker revealed matter of factly that the man who so often screams about fake news was putting out fake news stories about his GOP rivals before he even declared that he was running. David Pecker put himself, Cohen and Trump in a room with clear knowledge their activities were criminal in nature.
Next came witnesses to verify and enter into the record a plethora of texts, emails, invoices and receipts to prove that every word David Pecker had said was true.
Then came Keith Davidson whose evidence that Trump knew all about the illegal payments to Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels was again backed up by documents and was presented beside Trump's contemporaneous denials of the proven facts and claims that the allegations of his affairs were utter false.
The prosecution is following a strategy of making a claim, proving the claim to be true with witness testimony, backing up that witness testimony with documents then showing how Donald Trump had twisted and turned through an ever changing narrative to explain away the incriminating evidence. A strategy that may pay dividends when, at the end of the trial, Trump is seen to try the same in front of an impartial jury armed with all the facts.
Away from Trump's inability to control his bowel movements and stay awake the rest of the trial hasn't been going in a direction anyone in the MAGA camp would like.
I think the strategy for Donald Trump, and he used it before the trial ever started, was to attack Michael Cohen, cast doubt on his credibility and pursue a strategy of jury negation based on the Trump v Cohen narrative, and that's not how it has been working out at all.
First Trump's long time friend, and someone who clearly bears no animus towards the former President, David Pecker revealed matter of factly that the man who so often screams about fake news was putting out fake news stories about his GOP rivals before he even declared that he was running. David Pecker put himself, Cohen and Trump in a room with clear knowledge their activities were criminal in nature.
Next came witnesses to verify and enter into the record a plethora of texts, emails, invoices and receipts to prove that every word David Pecker had said was true.
Then came Keith Davidson whose evidence that Trump knew all about the illegal payments to Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels was again backed up by documents and was presented beside Trump's contemporaneous denials of the proven facts and claims that the allegations of his affairs were utter false.
The prosecution is following a strategy of making a claim, proving the claim to be true with witness testimony, backing up that witness testimony with documents then showing how Donald Trump had twisted and turned through an ever changing narrative to explain away the incriminating evidence. A strategy that may pay dividends when, at the end of the trial, Trump is seen to try the same in front of an impartial jury armed with all the facts.