The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by McAz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:09 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Aziz wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Aziz wrote:Muslim?

Image

No, just a poncey cunt :cuppaT:

He looks suspicious to me. :dunno:

Better call the fashion police :cuppaT:

Won't UKIP sort him?

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:08 pm

Puzzler wrote:It was a pop at extremism/non integration, plenty of white muslim fundamentalists/extremists dress in that 'style' too and they look no less ridiculous than any other muslim dressed like that. To use a couple of semi famous examples - convicted terrorist Salahuddin aka Richard Dart, and that ginger twat Jordan Horner who was part of the 'Muslim Patrols' in Tower Hamlets.


Nah Nah Nah!! You said "dressing in a Western way is a big factor in integrating - that means not dressing like an Afghan or Pakistani tribesman, or wearing a black bedsheet with a slit cut out for the eyes.". You specifically said Afghan or Pakistani tribesman. Not extremist, not Islamic but Afghani and Pakistani tribesman (or how you think they dress anyway, you appear to have issues with class), and you bring women into it as well, the very same women who are the victim of extremists. So no Puzzler, you were just being racist.

And then there is your hatred of the white middle class. Not only do you pick out the skin colour of the sub group you despise but apparently you think none of them can pronounce the letter R? When did this classism first begin to manifest itself in you?

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Puzzler » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:05 pm

Aziz wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Aziz wrote:Muslim?

Image

No, just a poncey cunt :cuppaT:

He looks suspicious to me. :dunno:

Better call the fashion police :cuppaT:

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by McAz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:03 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Aziz wrote:Muslim?

Image

No, just a poncey cunt :cuppaT:

He looks suspicious to me. :dunno:

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Puzzler » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:00 pm

Aziz wrote:Muslim?

Image

No, just a poncey cunt :cuppaT:

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by McAz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:56 pm

Muslim?

Image

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Puzzler » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:52 pm

Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:Hint guest - just chucking around the 'r' word without any evidence doesn't make you come across as a rational, calm person - it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickheadhence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post . Islam has not and never will be a race, it's a religious and political ideology and it's no more racist to be opposed to its influence on our society than it is to be opposed to Kim jong Unism.


Wrong again Puzzler. Correctly identifying racist assertions and pointing them out does make one calm and rational. Banging on about people "sweaming wacism" when both words contain an "R" not "W" and the fact that one cannot, in fact, scream at all on the internet, makes you look like a racist incapable of debate. And besides you picked on individual countries for your clothing related racism (or "welated wacism" in that infantile way you like to pretend people who disagree with you have a speech impediments) which had nothing to do with religion, which ruins your normal refuge for racist behavior. Clear up your act and maybe people will be able to conduct a discussion with you, right now you are clearly incapable of it.

it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickheadhence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post - Racism and class hatred. Sort yourself out.

It was a pop at extremism/non integration, plenty of white muslim fundamentalists/extremists dress in that 'style' too and they look no less ridiculous than any other muslim dressed like that. To use a couple of semi famous examples - convicted terrorist Salahuddin aka Richard Dart, and that ginger twat Jordan Horner who was part of the 'Muslim Patrols' in Tower Hamlets.

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Puzzler » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:48 pm

Guest wrote:Hang on a moment!!!!

Puzzler wrote: it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickhead hence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post.


Are you saying that white middle class people are incapable of pronouncing the letter R????

No, it was a pisstake of white middle class UAF and anti UKIP types...

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:29 pm

Hang on a moment!!!!

Puzzler wrote: it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickhead hence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post.


Are you saying that white middle class people are incapable of pronouncing the letter R????

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:08 pm

Puzzler wrote:Hint guest - just chucking around the 'r' word without any evidence doesn't make you come across as a rational, calm person - it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickheadhence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post . Islam has not and never will be a race, it's a religious and political ideology and it's no more racist to be opposed to its influence on our society than it is to be opposed to Kim jong Unism.


Wrong again Puzzler. Correctly identifying racist assertions and pointing them out does make one calm and rational. Banging on about people "sweaming wacism" when both words contain an "R" not "W" and the fact that one cannot, in fact, scream at all on the internet, makes you look like a racist incapable of debate. And besides you picked on individual countries for your clothing related racism (or "welated wacism" in that infantile way you like to pretend people who disagree with you have a speech impediments) which had nothing to do with religion, which ruins your normal refuge for racist behavior. Clear up your act and maybe people will be able to conduct a discussion with you, right now you are clearly incapable of it.

it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickheadhence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post - Racism and class hatred. Sort yourself out.

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:54 pm

Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
I don't have a husband. The question still stands despite your shitty deflection.

I don't think I've ever mentioned Indonesians in any of my posts, going right back to when I joined DS 3 years ago, so why exactly did you ask me that if you weren't trying to deflect as well? For the record I don't have a problem with educated/highly skilled Indonesians, or any other nationality coming here.


even though most Indonesians 7/8 are Muslim. :whistle:

Islam =/= muslims. Is that you Tumbles?


Are you so incapable of debate you must accuse every poster of being someone else. :shake head:


It means we know these Britain First twats are racist, they think they are superior to Arabs.

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Mark » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:45 pm

guesty chose him name unwisely imho

cos Noye
tho a villain and hard man, never really hurt anyone
who weren't hurting him
and that includes the poor young boxer who was smashing noyes head in at swanley
tho found guilty of murder
it could be said it was self defence


anyways
whats a banged up London villain got to do with the price of eggs?
or muslim extremists teaching OUR children to hate, guesty

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:22 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
I don't have a husband. The question still stands despite your shitty deflection.

I don't think I've ever mentioned Indonesians in any of my posts, going right back to when I joined DS 3 years ago, so why exactly did you ask me that if you weren't trying to deflect as well? For the record I don't have a problem with educated/highly skilled Indonesians, or any other nationality coming here.


even though most Indonesians 7/8 are Muslim. :whistle:

Islam =/= muslims. Is that you Tumbles?


Are you so incapable of debate you must accuse every poster of being someone else. :shake head:

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Puzzler » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:02 pm

Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
I don't have a husband. The question still stands despite your shitty deflection.

I don't think I've ever mentioned Indonesians in any of my posts, going right back to when I joined DS 3 years ago, so why exactly did you ask me that if you weren't trying to deflect as well? For the record I don't have a problem with educated/highly skilled Indonesians, or any other nationality coming here.


even though most Indonesians 7/8 are Muslim. :whistle:

Islam =/= muslims. Is that you Tumbles?

Re: The Islamic 'Trojan Horse' agenda - a danger to our future?

Post by Guest » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:57 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:Hint guest - just chucking around the 'r' word without any evidence doesn't make you come across as a rational, calm person - it makes you look like a white, middle class liberal dickhead hence the 'waacist' and 'scweam' in my last post. Islam has not and never will be a race, it's a religious and political ideology and it's no more racist to be opposed to its influence on our society than it is to be opposed to Kim jong Unism.


Why don't you like Indonesians or want them here?

Have you stopped beating your wife? (We can all play silly bollocks strawman questions guest)


I don't have a husband. The question still stands despite your shitty deflection.

I don't think I've ever mentioned Indonesians in any of my posts, going right back to when I joined DS 3 years ago, so why exactly did you ask me that if you weren't trying to deflect as well? For the record I don't have a problem with educated/highly skilled Indonesians, or any other nationality coming here.


even though most Indonesians 7/8 are Muslim. :whistle:

Top