Dogs Sleeping Forum

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

Well i'm reading mixed reports. Some say there were workers on site, then another says there wasn't any.

Whether the Frenchies will get to the bottom of it is another matter but i remember when the Cutty Sark went up in flame, that was found to be some numpty renovation worker who'd left a vacuuum cleaner on for two days.

They were broadcasting to the world before the embers had cooled that it was an electrical fault ... that was one very quick and short investigation but .... of course it's not the final result and there will be an proper enquiry.
But the news has already started pumping out belief system fodder so that video is interesting.

Fletch wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:

Cobs wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

The deep state torched it.

Is Fletch on the case?

It's religion, it's a CT from the get go.

MungoBrush wrote:

McHenry wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:

Cannydc wrote:Social media users with Muslim names are not by any means certain to be Muslims.

And Drongo, your inbuilt Tory Islamophobia is shining like a beacon.

In point of fact a genuine Muslim would not celebrate the destruction of place of worship to the Abrahamic God because however much they might disagree with the form of worship the building itself would be considered a sacred space.

Good point. One might have hoped that Islamophobia would have died down with the defeat of ISIS - but still the haters persist.

Is pointing out Muslims celebrating the fire at Notre Dame cathedral now called Islamophobia?
What about reporting the beheading of Yazidi sex slaves by Muslims? Is that now Islamophobia?

MungoBrush wrote:

McHenry wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:

Cannydc wrote:Social media users with Muslim names are not by any means certain to be Muslims.

And Drongo, your inbuilt Tory Islamophobia is shining like a beacon.

In point of fact a genuine Muslim would not celebrate the destruction of place of worship to the Abrahamic God because however much they might disagree with the form of worship the building itself would be considered a sacred space.

Good point. One might have hoped that Islamophobia would have died down with the defeat of ISIS - but still the haters persist.

Is pointing out Muslims celebrating the fire at Notre Dame cathedral now called Islamophobia?
What about reporting the beheading of Yazidi sex slaves by Muslims? Is that now Islamophobia?

MungoBrush wrote:In Paris - even an Indian steel company has offered to donate steel for the reconstruction

Not a word that I can find from any French Muslim organisation whatsoever.

MungoBrush wrote:There are certain groups of people who migrate here who like our way of like and want to become British. They make an effort to fit in and aren’t trying to change our society

There are other groups who come here who clearly don’t like the way things are
They don’t like our food so they want us all to change to their ways
They don’t like our schools so they start their ow
They don’t like our clothes so the wear other stuff
They don’t like our laws so they try to change them

McHenry wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:

Cannydc wrote:Social media users with Muslim names are not by any means certain to be Muslims.

And Drongo, your inbuilt Tory Islamophobia is shining like a beacon.

In point of fact a genuine Muslim would not celebrate the destruction of place of worship to the Abrahamic God because however much they might disagree with the form of worship the building itself would be considered a sacred space.

Good point. One might have hoped that Islamophobia would have died down with the defeat of ISIS - but still the haters persist.

Cactus Jack wrote:

Cannydc wrote:Social media users with Muslim names are not by any means certain to be Muslims.

And Drongo, your inbuilt Tory Islamophobia is shining like a beacon.

In point of fact a genuine Muslim would not celebrate the destruction of place of worship to the Abrahamic God because however much they might disagree with the form of worship the building itself would be considered a sacred space.

Guest wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

Well i'm reading mixed reports. Some say there were workers on site, then another says there wasn't any.

Whether the Frenchies will get to the bottom of it is another matter but i remember when the Cutty Sark went up in flame, that was found to be some numpty renovation worker who'd left a vacuuum cleaner on for two days.

They were broadcasting to the world before the embers had cooled that it was an electrical fault ... that was one very quick and short investigation but .... of course it's not the final result and there will be an proper enquiry.
But the news has already started pumping out belief system fodder so that video is interesting.

Yeah like videos have never been doctored before.

Cannydc wrote:Social media users with Muslim names are not by any means certain to be Muslims.

And Drongo, your inbuilt Tory Islamophobia is shining like a beacon.

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

Well i'm reading mixed reports. Some say there were workers on site, then another says there wasn't any.

Whether the Frenchies will get to the bottom of it is another matter but i remember when the Cutty Sark went up in flame, that was found to be some numpty renovation worker who'd left a vacuuum cleaner on for two days.

They were broadcasting to the world before the embers had cooled that it was an electrical fault ... that was one very quick and short investigation but .... of course it's not the final result and there will be an proper enquiry.
But the news has already started pumping out belief system fodder so that video is interesting.

Grafenwalder wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

Well i'm reading mixed reports. Some say there were workers on site, then another says there wasn't any.

Whether the Frenchies will get to the bottom of it is another matter but i remember when the Cutty Sark went up in flame, that was found to be some numpty renovation worker who'd left a vacuuum cleaner on for two days.

Grafenwalder wrote:

Cobs wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

The deep state torched it.

Is Fletch on the case?

Cobs wrote:

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

The deep state torched it.

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?

Rolluplostinspace wrote:

Grafenwalder wrote:But the workers were on site on the roof until 1750hrs. I find it more than beyond a stretch of imagination that not one of them wouldn't have noticed a person walking around without a hi-viz jacket on!

You'd have thought so so what's going on here?