Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by McAz » Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm

Perhaps he's mentally ill like his wife's murderer? :roll:

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Guest » Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:18 pm

malamute wrote:The widower of Labour MP Jo Cox has finally admitted to being a sex pest. Always thought he looked as guilty as hell when allegations were made against him when he worked for Save The Children. There was him speaking to the country as though he was Saint Brendan and all along he was harbouring his secret.

Its all over the papers tonight so take your pick where you read it. This will do charities even more harm.


Seeing as you despise sex pests, where are your threads on the 36 plus Tory MP sex pests?

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Keyser » Thu Feb 22, 2018 3:29 pm

Stooo wrote:Posts have been removed. :smilin:


What post were those? :smilin:

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Text » Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:11 pm

Cannydc wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
Cannydc wrote:
Trapper John wrote:
"We had difficult times, we had amazing times, but I'm not going to recount conversations I had with her because she's not here."


Nice move with the 'don't pick on me, remember my wife got murdered in case you forgot'

"Certainly, I had too much to drink at times."


Another greaseball who thinks just coz he's pissed he can do anything, life's not a catholic confessional mate, where you can fess up and everything is instantly forgiven, time and time again.

Typical liberal shit ball :hand:


He sounds like an unsavoury character, that's for sure - assuming that the people coming out of the woodwork are genuine.

And we all know what you think about people coming out of the woodwork to accuse men of sexual misdemeanors, don't we TJ ???


Well of course using that assumption but it's hardly an assumption when the bloke admits himself he might have been a notoroius sex pest and groper.

I bet he used to photocopy his cock and stick it in the faces of female workers at Christmas parties like what I used to do. :mrgreen:


:pmsl: :pmsl:

Kiss this, sweetheart....

.. .Image

You smooth talker!
And they say romance is dead. :gigglesnshit:

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Stooo » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:46 pm

Posts have been removed. :smilin:

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Keyser » Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:00 pm

Cox by name Cox by nature - the repulsive shit used his own wife's murder so that he could sexually harrass/assault women even more than he had done in the past.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Kat » Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:51 pm

Stooo wrote:He's a twat and has done the right thing by removing himself from the positions of trust that he held, he needs to keep out of the public eye for good. Other people who are in similar public positions should do the same.

Agree what a nasty creepy man he is

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Guest » Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:57 pm

You were all warned.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Guest » Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:49 pm

Image

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Stooo » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:57 pm

He's a twat and has done the right thing by removing himself from the positions of trust that he held, he needs to keep out of the public eye for good. Other people who are in similar public positions should do the same.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Grafenwalder » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:39 pm

Guest wrote:Or as he has said he grabbed a lady by the throat and made iffensive remarks.

Thats just the bit he has told us.

He seems quite an unsavoury character.


I'm afraid the only source i can find where that's printed is the DM and Star. Both have well known reputations for their unreliable hyperbolic reporting and only fit for the toilet.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Trapper John » Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:02 am

Guest wrote:Or as he has said he grabbed a lady by the throat and made iffensive remarks.

Thats just the bit he has told us.

He seems quite an unsavoury character.


Can you grab someone by the throat and be 'inoffensive'? - It seems he has quite a high opinion of himself in the lady stakes and doesn't take rejection very well at all.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Guest » Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:29 am

Or as he has said he grabbed a lady by the throat and made iffensive remarks.

Thats just the bit he has told us.

He seems quite an unsavoury character.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Grafenwalder » Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:02 pm

Cannydc wrote:
Grafenwalder wrote:
Guest wrote:He's a sexual predator, what you're reading today is the tip of the iceberg. He's been hiding behind his dead wife for nearly two years now. He's absolute nobhead.

I seem to remember similar allegations being leveled at Aled Jones last year over a couple of 'inappropriate' text messages sent to a female work colleague 10 years back. Quite why anyone needs to keep text messages on their phone for such a length of time begs the question as to who is the real predator and who is the prey there? Finally the BBC saw sense and reinstated Jones.

The matter over Cox isn't even news. It surfaced last year so exactly what reason it's been dragged up again for now with articles full of allegations leading to assumptions and people with highly over imaginative minds, makes me wonder where it's coming from and for what purpose. It's provided a convenient deflection taking the heat off the recent Oxfam revelations.


Slow news day.

Time to resurrect stories like 'Corbyn is a commie spy' and 'Cox is a sexual predator'.

Oh, and It's provided a convenient deflection from Tory civil wars and their Brexishambles efforts.

Exactly.


Guest wrote:
Grafenwalder wrote:
Guest wrote:He's a sexual predator, what you're reading today is the tip of the iceberg. He's been hiding behind his dead wife for nearly two years now. He's absolute nobhead.

I seem to remember similar allegations being leveled at Aled Jones last year over a couple of 'inappropriate' text messages sent to a female work colleague 10 years back. Quite why anyone needs to keep text messages on their phone for such a length of time begs the question as to who is the real predator and who is the prey there? Finally the BBC saw sense and reinstated Jones.

The matter over Cox isn't even news. It surfaced last year so exactly what reason it's been dragged up again for now with articles full of allegations leading to assumptions and people with highly over imaginative minds, makes me wonder where it's coming from and for what purpose. It's provided a convenient deflection taking the heat off the recent Oxfam revelations.


He has quit two charities because of it. Something not right and he is obvs worried and trying to put a lid on it.

That doesn't make him a 'sexual predator' though does it? He has denied assault but admitted to "inappropriate" behaviour. Today that can be anything from a wolf whistle to what used to be everyday office banter. When women engage in either of the latter it's 'just a bit of fun' - when men engage it they are 'sexual predators' or 'perverts'.

Re: Brendan Cox Sex Pest

Post by Guest » Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:52 pm

Grafenwalder wrote:
Guest wrote:He's a sexual predator, what you're reading today is the tip of the iceberg. He's been hiding behind his dead wife for nearly two years now. He's absolute nobhead.

I seem to remember similar allegations being leveled at Aled Jones last year over a couple of 'inappropriate' text messages sent to a female work colleague 10 years back. Quite why anyone needs to keep text messages on their phone for such a length of time begs the question as to who is the real predator and who is the prey there? Finally the BBC saw sense and reinstated Jones.

The matter over Cox isn't even news. It surfaced last year so exactly what reason it's been dragged up again for now with articles full of allegations leading to assumptions and people with highly over imaginative minds, makes me wonder where it's coming from and for what purpose. It's provided a convenient deflection taking the heat off the recent Oxfam revelations.


He has quit two charities because of it. Something not right and he is obvs worried and trying to put a lid on it.

Top