Dogs Sleeping Forum

Lady Murasaki wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:Trump is coming for your guns

If that’s true, he’s a genius.

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:Trump is coming for your guns

Maddog wrote:

Axtol wrote:

Guest wrote:Of course you aren't. Like most uber-machos with a need for big guns to make up for deficiencies elsewhere you know it's far less likely that a woman will kill you than that you will be able to overpower her. The figures show us that a woman with a gun is less likely to retreat and seek assistance so you, or any assailant, can force yourself on her much more often successfully than if she retreated or withdrew. Presumably that's one of the reasons why women in gun owning households are far more likely to be sexually abused than those in non gun owning households

I generally find that the people throwing the "You're just macho/compensating for something" cliche around are themselves insecure about something. Is it just jealousy that you can't own a weapon to defend yourself that makes you want to drag them down to not being able to either?

It's likely a lack of experience with weapons and women that causes his foul mood.

Guest wrote:

Axtol wrote:

Guest wrote:Of course you aren't. Like most uber-machos with a need for big guns to make up for deficiencies elsewhere you know it's far less likely that a woman will kill you than that you will be able to overpower her. The figures show us that a woman with a gun is less likely to retreat and seek assistance so you, or any assailant, can force yourself on her much more often successfully than if she retreated or withdrew. Presumably that's one of the reasons why women in gun owning households are far more likely to be sexually abused than those in non gun owning households

I generally find that the people throwing the "You're just macho/compensating for something" cliche around are themselves insecure about something. Is it just jealousy that you can't own a weapon to defend yourself that makes you want to drag them down to not being able to either?

So you don't want to respond to the fact that women in gun owning households are more likely to be murdered, physically abused and sexually abused you prefer to try whatever this is. Are you the Albanian Princess we're heard so much about? Or are you someone else hoping the uber-macho cowboy will get rough with them? Good news, if that's your thing you two can head for the chapel right now but you better rush while it's still legal.

Axtol wrote:

Guest wrote:Of course you aren't. Like most uber-machos with a need for big guns to make up for deficiencies elsewhere you know it's far less likely that a woman will kill you than that you will be able to overpower her. The figures show us that a woman with a gun is less likely to retreat and seek assistance so you, or any assailant, can force yourself on her much more often successfully than if she retreated or withdrew. Presumably that's one of the reasons why women in gun owning households are far more likely to be sexually abused than those in non gun owning households

I generally find that the people throwing the "You're just macho/compensating for something" cliche around are themselves insecure about something. Is it just jealousy that you can't own a weapon to defend yourself that makes you want to drag them down to not being able to either?

Guest wrote:Trump is coming for your guns

Axtol wrote:

Guest wrote:Of course you aren't. Like most uber-machos with a need for big guns to make up for deficiencies elsewhere you know it's far less likely that a woman will kill you than that you will be able to overpower her. The figures show us that a woman with a gun is less likely to retreat and seek assistance so you, or any assailant, can force yourself on her much more often successfully than if she retreated or withdrew. Presumably that's one of the reasons why women in gun owning households are far more likely to be sexually abused than those in non gun owning households

I generally find that the people throwing the "You're just macho/compensating for something" cliche around are themselves insecure about something. Is it just jealousy that you can't own a weapon to defend yourself that makes you want to drag them down to not being able to either?

Guest wrote:Of course you aren't. Like most uber-machos with a need for big guns to make up for deficiencies elsewhere you know it's far less likely that a woman will kill you than that you will be able to overpower her. The figures show us that a woman with a gun is less likely to retreat and seek assistance so you, or any assailant, can force yourself on her much more often successfully than if she retreated or withdrew. Presumably that's one of the reasons why women in gun owning households are far more likely to be sexually abused than those in non gun owning households

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

Not if you're a female who just smoked a guy who walked right through a restraining order eh?

Not then, but for the many more times that women are subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse, which is five times more likely in gun owning households, or when she is killed, sixteen times more likely in gun owning households, then your argument lies in tatters.

I guess if you're the sort of person who would gladly pay $1,000 for the chance to win $10 and hated all women that would make sense but to everyone else it's kinda stupid

Nah, I'm the sort a person who isn't worried about women owning firearms.

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

Not if you're a female who just smoked a guy who walked right through a restraining order eh?

Not then, but for the many more times that women are subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse, which is five times more likely in gun owning households, or when she is killed, sixteen times more likely in gun owning households, then your argument lies in tatters.

I guess if you're the sort of person who would gladly pay $1,000 for the chance to win $10 and hated all women that would make sense but to everyone else it's kinda stupid

Nah, I'm the sort a person who isn't worried about women owning firearms.

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:

Guest wrote:

Maddog wrote:Against the UK yes. Not against Norway, Finland or Switzerland.

And if you want to compare the number of times women shoot men tying to harm them, we are still the reigning world champion.

I know you are not in this group, but there are men that don't like the idea of women being able to shoot them.

Except of course women are far more likely to suffer violent sexual and physical abuse in gun owning households - https://everytownresearch.org/guns-domestic-violence/ - sort of defeats your argument doesn't it

Not if you're a female who just smoked a guy who walked right through a restraining order eh?

Not then, but for the many more times that women are subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse, which is five times more likely in gun owning households, or when she is killed, sixteen times more likely in gun owning households, then your argument lies in tatters.

I guess if you're the sort of person who would gladly pay $1,000 for the chance to win $10 and hated all women that would make sense but to everyone else it's kinda stupid